 WebProWorld
Dev Forum |
Server woes
Well I’m looking for a new server for my personal business that is about to launch but weighing the pros and cons...
Question
What would cause a 2 month old Dell Flat Pannel monitor to display many sites at a lower resolution (600 x 800) but only once a week or so...
How can i stop others copying text from my site?
Hi folks, i have a large directory which has taken hours to type up etc and people are now copying it. How can I stop them?
|
|
|
|
Recent Articles |
Microsoft Scares Asia With Linux Lawsuit Warnings
Microsoft Chief Executive Steve Ballmer warned Asian governments that they could face patent lawsuits for using the open source Linux operating system.
Linux Networkx and Novell Create HPC Certification Center
Linux Networx has partnered with Novell to create a High Performance Computing (HPC) Certification Center located at Linux Networx to help Independent Software Vendors (ISV) certify their applications on Novell's SUSE LINUX Enterprise Server for use in clustered environments.
Rebuilding failed Linux software RAID
Recently I had a hard drive fail. It was part of a Linux software RAID 1 (mirrored drives), so we lost no data, and just needed to replace hardware. However, the raid does requires rebuilding. A hardware array would usually automatically rebuild upon drive replacement, but this needed some help.
|
|
|
|
12.01.04
Sun And Open Source
 By A.P. Lawrence
II'm reading everywhere that Sun is making Solaris 10 free and open source ( http://www.rednova.com/news/display/?id=106224).
However, that's not quite true yet: if you go to their download pages, you;ll have to accept a license that says (among other things):
2.0 LIMITED LICENSE
Sun grants You a non-exclusive and non-transferable license to internally
reproduce and use Software solely for purpose of evaluation in a test
environment. Software shall not be used in a production environment. (Refer to
Section 5.2 for reporting requirements)
Apparently the free, open source version won't be available till later - maybe January. I'm downloading the release available now, but haven't installed it yet.
This is supposed to include complete Linux capability. According to Sun:
We've made Solaris 10 the most interoperable operating system platform ever.
Linux applications will run on Solaris 10--natively. No emulation, complication,
no performance hit.
I admit to having always liked Solaris. I wasn't overly impressed by their earlier x86 releases, but maybe this one will be different.
We don't even yet know what Sun means by "open source", but already the pundits are arguing about whether making Solaris "open source" (whatever that turns out to mean) will help them or hurt them.
On the one hand, we have Sun thinking that their service network and promised superior performance will push them upward. Service and support certainly are important, and are a great way for a Linux vendor (apps or OS) to extract money from a free product, but I don't see this adding much to the attractiveness of Solaris 10. It's a nice extra, but it isn't going to cause people to switch, or stop people from switching away.
Performance is another issue, though. If Solaris 10 really can outperform Linux, that can be a reason to switch. But it has to be near mind-blowing to have much influence.
Of course, there is another way: if important apps only run on your OS, or run badly on anything but your OS, or are painful and difficult to run elsewhere, you can be open source while effectively maintaining the same monopoly you had with closed source. I had mentioned this before at How to make money with open source, and here's an interesting take from an interview with Sun's Jonathan Schwartz: (From http://www.osnews.com/story.php?news_id=8982)
Red Hat locks Enterprise customers in, just like Microsoft does,by steadily moving away from the LSB, by patching and forking code (including using a very non-standard Linux kernel) and so applications get certified or only work in the Red Hat codebase and no other Linux distro.
But is that enough? It might be enough to survive, but it's not enough for Solaris to dominate Linux. RedHat may stay top dog with that strategy, but Solaris needs more, simply because it isn't Linux and doesn't get the benefit of Linux's quick response to both problems and market needs. In order to get that kind of responsiveness, Sun would need the legions of volunteer programmers that Linux enjoys, and that of course includes a lot of people working at companies who are competitive with Sun. Those folks are rather unlikely to jump on Solaris as their favorite OS.
Certainly Sun could have done this years ago, just as SCO could have. If either of them had, Linux might never have existed at all. It was the closed, expensive reality of Unix that was the reason Linux came to be. Had Unix vendors understood what their greed and short-sightedness would eventually cause, maybe they would have opened up way back when. But they didn't.
The best Sun can hope for now is survival. If Solaris 10 is good enough, that should be attainable. But they aren't going to replace Linux.
*Originally published at APLawrence.com
About the Author:
A.P. Lawrence provides SCO Unix and Linux consulting services http://www.pcunix.com
|
