 |
|
Recent
Articles |
Giving In To Temptation
This analysis was conceived when the coauthors discovered we'd each been independently seriously tempted to buy a Mac Mini, and realized what that temptation implied. Eric Steven Raymond and Rob Landley at World Domination 201.That article means. What's the impact of giving investors (who...
More Open Source Funding - What Does It Mean?
Matthew Aslett, Matt Asay & Alex Fletcher are all writing about the increased funding that open source companies have received in 2006. Good news indeed. (Picture from robinicus919). I got to thinking about what this all means. What's the impact of giving investors...
Mysterious Lockups
Of all computer problems, the unresponsive hang is the most annoying and most difficult to trace. There's no crash, no panic: everything just stops dead. The keyboard is useless, telnets just time out - you have no choice but to power cycle the machine. Well, maybe.
Controlling Disk Space W/ Symbolic Links
I've covered this in other articles here, but when I went searching for something to point a customer at I had a little trouble finding it, so we'll do it here: Let's say you have a system with a few filesystems. One of those systems is getting tight on space, but the other...
The Patent Ploy
Microsoft to Offer Sales Support for Novell's Suse Linux... Huh? Did I hear that right? Yep, there it is again: Linux to work with Windows. A lot of people are wondering what Microsoft is up to, what possible motivation drove this. I'd ask the same of Novell: lying down with the lion is not usually a good strategy for smaller animals.
Terrasoft Supplying Linux For PS3
Is it really news when Terrasoft announces that it will be supplying Linux for the PS3? I mean, sheesh, you can't even buy a PS3 yet. On the other hand...Is this going to be the road by which the insidious penguin infiltrates the households of god-fearing folk who otherwise would have nothing to do with anything not blessed by Saint...
Zeroconf
I liked the last paragraph of Carla Schroder's "Run Zeroconf for Linux in a Snap."Zeroconf is a lightweight, fairly simple set of cross-platform protocols that can work on any system- Linux, Unix, Macintosh or Windows. But currently Windows is the odd one out, as Microsoft is showing little inclination to play with the rest of us, and are more interested in its own service discovery...
|
|
|
01.24.07
Free Software - Should It Be Free?
 By
Savio Rodrigues
By now, you've probably heard about or read Mark Shuttleworth's view on keeping free software free. Matt Asay has a take on Mark's post here.
 I don't think that Mark's basic point is "because RHEL is a closed binary, it's proprietary" as Matt suggests. I read Mark's point to be: "Free Software should be freely available". So, that means, the RHEL binaries and updates should be freely available from Red Hat and freely distributable (you can already get the RHEL source freely from Red Hat).
Mark is not suggesting that a thoroughly tested, widely certified and secure RHEL product should not be available. (He actually says these are requirements).
He's suggesting that a such rock-solid product (binaries) should
be available for free and customers who want to pay for support around it, should do so. Those who want that same rock-solid platform (binaries) without support should be able to get it for
free.
So, to Matt's groceries/entree scenario. Mark suggests that the groceries are already free (i.e. kernel.org, Fedora, etc). He'd like the entree (i.e. RHEL) to be free for pickup if you're going to eat it at home. But if you want to eat at the restaurant, hear the nice music, ask the chef some questions or impress your date, then you're going to have to pay for that service/support.
So the entree is no different whether you decide to eat it at home (i.e. RHEL for free without support) or in the restaurant (i.e. RHEL with paid support).
NOTE: This is my take on Mark's post, and the pragmatic "me" doesn't totally buy into it. I don't think that Red Hat, or other vendor, would be able to fund the same level of product development if some (significant) portion of today's paying customers were to stop paying. There would be a direct link from:
- reduced revenue
- to reduced development funds
- to reduced functionality
- to reduced customer satisfaction
- to reduced users
- to further reduced revenue (repeat cycle)
Unless you just have a chunk of cash you can throw at the effort without worrying about meeting investor expectations. But since we all have bills and beer to pay for, things like revenue and profit require some consideration.
PS: The pic for freehugscampaign.org made me laugh, so I wanted to use it.
Comments
About the Author:
I am taking a semi-break from IBM life as I return to finish a PhD in Industrial Engineering. I've held roles in market intelligence, strategy and product management. I'm ex-product manager of IBM WAS Community Edition, and blog about enterprise open source topics.
|
